1. Consonant sounds
Chinese students tend to have difficulty with English sounds that have similar Mandarin counterparts, which are actually different from each other, such as pinyin[b] and English /b/, pinyin[sh] and English/ʃ/, pinyin[s] and English/θ/, pinyin[z] and English/ð/. In this case, Chinese learners tend to replace those sounds with the nearest equivalents in Mandarin.
Table 1 presents both Mandarin and English consonants arranged by articulatory manner (row) and place (column). Blue items in the Chinese panel denote sounds that do not occur in English, while the sounds in red represent sounds that occur in English but are absent in Chinese.
Table 1. Chart of English and Chinese (Mandarin) consonant phonemes
According to Table 1, the following 15 phonemes in English that are not found in Mandarin (/b/, /ɡ/, /d/, /v/, /θ/, /ð/, /z/, /s/, /ʃ/, /ʒ/, /h/, /tʃ/, /dʒ/, /r/, /j/) contribute to a great deal of difficulties for Chinese learners.
English /ʒ/ and /ʃ/ sound similar to the Mandarin pinyin sounds [r] and [sh] respectively, but actually they are very different in terms of the manner of articulation (for [r] and /ʒ/) and place of articulation (for [sh] and /ʃ/), but a considerable number of the English speakers in China tend to replace the English /ʒ/ and/ʃ/ with the counterparts [r] and [sh] in Mandarin pinyin.
/ʃ/, /tʃ/and /dʒ/ in English are similar to Mandarin sounds [sh], [ch], and [zh]. English/ʃ/ is a palato-alveolar fricative, and /tʃ/and , /dʒ/ are palato-alveolar affricates; the former two are voiceless and the latter is voiced. However, the Mandarin [sh], [ch] and [zh] are palato-alveolar retroflex (i.e. the tip of tongue is curled back against the palate when articulating these sounds), and all are voiceless. Mandarin speakers tend to replace /ʃ/, /tʃ/and /dʒ/ by [sh], [ch], and [zh] respectively.
Table 2 listed the features caused by those English consonants that do not exist in Mandarin.
Table 2. English consonants DO NOT exist in Mandarin
Back nasal /ŋ/ exists in both English and Mandarin and it can only occur at the final position of a syllable in both languages. However, the problem here is /ŋ/ is not an easy sound even in Mandarin. Mandarin speakers tend to merge /n/ and /ŋ/ even when they speak Mandarin, for example, [shen] (身body) is pronounced as [sheng] (生live). This feature can also be found when Mandarin speakers speak English. For example, sing/sɪŋ/becomes sin/sIn/, and rang(/ræŋ/) becomes ran(/ræn/).
Front nasal /n/ exists in both English and Mandarin, but many Mandarin speakers cannot distinguish /n/ from /l/ when they speak Mandarin, especially speakers from southern China. This unclear distinction between /n/ & /l/ can also be found when they speak English, for example, I’m sorry, I don’t know /nəʊ/becomes I don’t low /ləʊ/
/l/ also exists in both English and Mandarin, but the position of/l/ in English and Mandarin are quite different. In Mandarin, /l/ can only appear at the initial position, while in English it can be the initial, the middle or the final position of the syllable. Apart from the conflation with /n/ when /l/ is at the initial position, /l/ also causes much trouble for mandarin speakers when it is at final position of the syllable or in final consonant cluster, for example,
- L-vocalization (i.e. the realization of /l/ as vowels (e.g. /u/ or /ɒ/) when it is preceded by a back vowel)
- e.g. ‘fool’ (/fu:l/)→‘foo-o’ (/ fuɒ/)
- Deletion of final /l/
- e.g. ‘fool’ (/fu:l/)→‘foo’(/fu:/)
- Deletion of /l/ in final consonant cluster
- e.g.world (/wə:ld/) →word(/wə: d/)
In English, the consonants /b, d, g/ are voiced, but only the voiceless versions of them (i.e. / p, t, k /) exist in Mandarin. In English, the main distinctions between /p/ & /b/ are voicing and aspiration, but in Mandarin, both [p] & [b] are voiceless sounds and they mainly differ in aspiration. This difference leads to a tendency in many Mandarin speakers to have weak voicing for voiced English consonants, for example:
- /d/ in duck /dʌk/→[d] in大[dà]
- /b/ in but /bʌt/→ [b] in爸 [bà]
3. Final consonants
In the Mandarin pinyin system, syllables generally end with a vowel sound. Only two consonant sounds (i.e. back nasal /ŋ/ andfront nasal /n/) can occur at the end of syllables.
Many Mandarin speakers transfer this habit to their pronunciation of English, so they tend to either drop the final consonant or add an extra vowel at the end of the word. As a result, the omission of final consonants and insertion of final vowels in English can cause some misunderstandings. For example, deletion of the final consonant will lead to:
- help /help/ → hell /hel/
- tool /tu:l/→ too / two /tu:/
- dog /dɒɡ/; dot /dɒt/; doc /dɒk/ → /dɒ/
Some speakers may over-emphasize the final consonant because of the negative transfer of CV syllable structure in Chinese. As a result, the insertion of extra vowel(s) at the end becomes a common problem of Chinese speakers, for example:
- orange /‘ɒrɪndʒ/→orangee/‘ɒrɪndʒɪ/
- kill /kɪl/→ killer /’kɪlə/
- miss /mɪs/ → missi/mɪsɪ/
4. Consonant clusters
Consonant clusters are very common in English. They can be at the initial, medial or final position of a word, and they can consist of a cluster of 2 or more consonants – e.g. black/blæk/; spring/sprɪŋ/; must/mʌst/; and text/tekst/. The word texts /teksts/ has a final blend of 4 consonants. However, initial and final consonant clusters are never found in Mandarin (Chang, 1987),so they cause considerable difficulty for Chinese speakers of English.
The common problem for consonant clusters is to make an additional syllable by adding a reduced vowel (e.g. /ə/), or to simplify the cluster by omitting the final consonant, for example,
- place /pleIs/→ palace/p«leIs/
- must/mʌst/→ muster /mʌstə/
- crisps/ krisps/→crispers /krispəs/
Part2. Vowels and Diphthongs
Roach (2004) proposed that the British English vowel system consists of 7 short vowels(/ɪ, e, Ɛ , æ, ʌ, ʊ, ɒ/), 5 long vowels (/iː uː ɜː ɔː ɑː/), and 8 diphthongs (/eɪ, əʊ, aɪ, aʊ, ɔɪ, ɪə, eə, ʊə/). In Ladeforged &Disner (2012), the American English as spoken by national newscasters has 14 or 15 distinct vowels, which includes 10 monophthongs (/iː, ɪ, Ɛ, æ, ʌ, ɝ, uː, ʊ, ɔː,ɑː/) and 5 diphthongs (/eɪ, oʊ, aɪ, aʊ, ɔɪ/ (p28).
Figure 1. The vowel chart of English
According to Hung (1986), Huang (2002) and Zhu (2011), there are 10 basic single vowel sounds in Chinese pinyin system. Based on the 10 basic vowel sounds, there are three kinds of finals(韻母yùn mǔ):
- 10 single finals (單韻母 dān yùn mǔ): A, o, e, i, ɨ (after [zh], [ch], [sh], [r]), and i (after [z], [c], [s]), ê, u, ü, er (retroflex compound which is made up of /e/ and a retroflex /r/)
- 13 two/three-vowel compound finals (複韻母fù yùn mǔ): ɑi, ei, ui, ɑo, ou, iu, iɑ,uɑ, ie(iê), üe(üê), iɑo, iou, uɑi
- 16 nasal compounds (鼻韻母 bí yùn mǔ ) [ ɑn, ɑng, en, eng,ong,in, ing, ün, iɑn , iɑng, iong,uɑn, uen, u Ang, u eng, üɑn]
Figure 2. Comparison between English and Mandarin vowel system
1. Substituting Mandarin vowels for English vowels.
Some of the Mandarin finals, which are not found in English, have similar correlates in English (See Table 4). Influenced by Mandarin, some Chinese speakers use Chinese sounds to replace the English sounds, for example,
- Ruler / ruːlə / often becomes [ru:l ɤ] (/ɤ / is “ē” in 喝 hē)
- Car/ kɑː/ often becomes [k a] (/a/ is “ā” in他 tā)
2. Absence of length contrast
The length contrast between long and short vowels in English does not exist in Mandarin, like ‘ship’ and ‘sheep’ (/i:/&/I/) and ‘full’ and ‘fool’ (/u:/&/U/).Therefore, Chinese learners are not naturally aware of the duration difference of the vowels in English and may not even produce or perceive those differences, for example,
- /i:/ and /ɪ/ e.g. Please sit in this seat. (/sɪt/ vs. /siː t/)
- /ʊ/ and /uː/ e.g. They pull me to the swimming pool. (/pʊl/ vs. /puːl/)
- /ɒ/ and /ɔː/ e.g. He shot from a short distance. (/ʃɒt/ vs. /ʃɔːt/)
(This feature and examples are shared by Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong)
From Figure 2, we can see that there is an [ê] sound in Mandarin which sounds similar to /e/and/æ/, but the position of [ê] is between /e/and/æ/. As a consequence, a considerable number of Chinese speakers cannot distinguish /e/ from /æ/, and tend to substitute /e/ for /æ/or vice versa, for example,
man /mæn/ often becomes men /men/
fan /fæn/ often becomes fen /fen/
Some learners even nasalize /æ/ because of the influence of standard Mandarin. Duanmu (2000) mentioned “a vowel preceding a final nasal consonant becomes nasalized, and there may be no oral closure” (p72), so that a word such as can (/kæn/) often becomes nasalize d/kæn/.
Compared with English diphthongs like /əʊ/, /aɪ/, /eɪ/, Mandarin compound finals tend to be pronounced with quicker and smaller lip and tongue movements. “Learners therefore make these sounds too short, with not enough distinction between the two counterparts.”(Chang, 1987, p.225) Influenced by their L1 (Mandarin), many Chinese learners tend to shorten diphthongs or replace the English diphthongs with English monophthongs, for examples,
- vow/vaʊ/ often becomes /vɔː/
- cake /keɪk/ often becomes /kɪk/
- name /neɪm/ often becomes /nem/
- sound/ saʊnd / often becomes /sɑːnd/
- shout (/ʃaʊt/) often becomes shot (/ʃɒt/)
- join /dʒɔɪn/ often becomes John (/dʒɒn/)
- point /pɔɪnt/ often becomes pond (/pɒnd/)
(This feature is shared by both Mandarin and Cantonese speakers)
Notes: In this webpage, “” is used for Mandarin Pinyin symbols, and “//” is used for IPA symbols.
Chang, J. (1987). Chinese speaker, Learner English: a teacher’s guide to interference and other problems (2nd ed) In M. Swan & B. Smith, (Eds.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, A. Y. W. & Li, D. C. S. (2000). English and Cantonese phonology in contrast: Explaining Cantonese ESL learners’ English pronunciation problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum13 (1), 67–8
Chen, W. D.(1983). Strucutres and functions of English Intonation. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Teaching Press.
Deterding, D. (2006). The pronunciation of English by speakers from China. English World-Wide, 27(2), 175-198
Deterding, D. & Wong, J. & Kirkpatrick, A. (2008). The pronunciation of Hong Kong English. English World-Wide29(2), 148-175. doi:10.1075/eww.29.2.03 det.
Duanmu, S. (2000). The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Francis, A.L.(2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 268–294.Reterived from http://psychology.msu.edu/SleepLab/Files/Francis_Ciocca_Ma_Fenn2008.pdf
Ge, C.G. [葛傳椝] (1980). Mantan you han yi ying wenti [漫談由漢譯英問題] (Free discussion on Chinese-English Translation).[翻譯通訊]Fanyi Tongxun (Chinese Translator’s Journal) 2, 1–8.
Groves, J. (2009). Hong Kong English – Does it Exist? HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies. 13.54-79. Reterived from http://lc.hkbu.edu.hk/book/pdf/v13_04.pdf
Hung, M. J. (1986). Putonghua-English-Cantonese Comparative Phonetics. Hong Kong: Jinye Publishing
Huang, B. R.[黃柏榮] (2002). Xian dai han yu [現代漢語] (Modern Chinese). [高等教育出版社] Gao deng jiao yu chu ban she(Higher Education Press)
International Phonetic Association, ed. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kachru, B. B. (1985a). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: English
language in the outer circle. In K. Bolton & B. B. Kachru (Eds.), World Englishes:
Critical concepts in linguistics: Vol. 3 (pp. 241- 269). London: Routledge.
Kachru, B. B. (1997).World Englishes 2000: Resources for Research and Teaching..
In L. E. Smith & M. L. Forman (Eds.) World Englishes 2000 (pp 209-251). Honolulu: College of Languages, Linguistics and Literature.
Kachru, B. B. (2005). Asian Englishes: Beyond the Canon. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Kirkpatrick, A., & Xu, Z. (2002). Chinese pragmatic norms and China English, World Englishes, 21(2), 260-279.
Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for International Communication and English Language Teaching, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ladefoged, P., & Disner, S. F. (2012), Vowels and Consonants 3 edition, Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Li, C. and Thompson, S. A. (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, D. C. S. (1996) Issues in Bilingualism and Biculturalism: A Hong Kong Case Study. New York: Peter Lang.
Li, D. C. S. (2000) Phonetic borrowing: Key to the vitality of written Cantonese in Hong Kong. Written Language and Literacy 3(2), 199–233.
Population Census Summary Results (Report). (2011). Census and Statistics Department. February 2012. p. 37, Retrieved 14 July 2013.
Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course, 4th Ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-78613-4
Roach, P. (2004). British English: Received Pronunciation, Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34 (2), 239–245, doi:10.1017/S0025100304001768
Setter, J., Wong, C.S.P., & Chan, B.H.S. (2010). Hong Kong English.Edinburgh, UK:Edinburgh University Press.
Smith, L. E., & Nelson, C. L. (2006). World Englishes and issues of intelligibility. In B. B. Kachru, Y. Kachru & C. L. Nelson (Eds.), The Handbook of world Englishes, (pp 428-445). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Schneider, E. W. (2003). The dynamics of new Englishes: From identity construction
to dialect birth. In K. Bolton & B. B. Kachru (Eds.), World Englishes: Critical concepts in linguistics: Vol. 1 (pp. 125-185). London: Routledge.
Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English – Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xu, Z. C.(2010). Chinese English, Features and Implications. HongKong, China: Open University of Hong Kong Press.
Wee, L. H. (2008). Phonological patterns in the Englishes of Singapore and Hong Kong. World Englishes, 27: 480–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.00580.x
Wang, H. (2007). English as a lingua franca: Mutual intelligibility of Chinese, Dutch and American speakers of English. LOT dissertation series, 147. LOT, Utrecht.
Zhu, L. (2011). Research on Chinese English Phonetics-The process from Chinese phonetics to Chinese English Phonetics(漢語語音對中式英語語音的影響研究), Bejing, China: China Environmental Science Press
Zhang, F.C. &Yin, P.P. (2009). A Study of Pronunciation Problems of English Learners in China. Asian Social Science, 5(6)
Kris Van de Poel, Ø. Hide. (2002). Interlanguage Phonology:Implications for a Remedial Pronunciation Course For Chinese Learners of English (Antwerp papers in linguistics). Retrieve from http://webhost.ua.ac.be/apil/apil100/hide.pdf
14479total visits,23visits today